The UK Government is currently considering its response to the ‘reciprocal tariffs’ announced by the US President Donald Trump on 2 April.
Under the plans, a range of products exported from the UK to the USA would be subject to 10% tariffs. This is in addition to a 25% global tariff on cars, steel and aluminium imported into the USA. On Thursday last week, Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds told Parliament that the UK is disappointed with the US tariffs and will continue constructive discussions with the US on a wider deal.
UK companies are being invited to give their views on what any future UK response should look like by providing feedback to questions asking them the average value of their US imports, the impact of any possible UK tariffs and how they would adjust to them.
The Government has also published an indicative list of the goods imported from the US that may be considered in a future UK response. The list does not include products in the wider public interest issues, such as medical supplies and military equipment.
The Business and Trade Secretary said “Our cool-headed, pragmatic approach means that talks with the US will continue to reflect our mandate to deliver economic stability, as we press the case for a trading relationship that supports businesses on both sides of the Atlantic, and reflects our Plan for Change and the best interests of the UK public.”
Ministers will continue to meet a broad range of businesses in the coming days to provide support and set out the Government’s priority of defending the interests of UK industry.
The four-week Request for Input will be open until Thursday 1 May and can be viewed here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/request-for-input-on-potential-uk-measures-in-response-to-us-tariffs
A new website has been launched by the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) offering practical guidance and support on the changes that the Employment Rights Act will introduce and what they can do to get ready.
A leading think tank has criticised the fiscal rules that the Chancellor uses to determine the government’s tax and spending plans. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has suggested that reducing complex finances to a pass‑or‑fail number misses the bigger picture.